Free Slots & Casino Games to Play Online | Caesars Games Casino jack and the united states of money review

Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. To get the free app, enter your mobile phone slots online real money. The result is a troubling but colorful portrait of business as usual in Washington.

The thing that makes this book stand out is the incredible amount of original reporting that casino jack and the united states of money review into it. The tale is also well written and not overly hyped. It is told in delicious, understated detail that could easily be turned into a movie script. If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? Learn more about Amazon Prime. If you already have an account, sign in. Check your Internet connection and go to your cartor try again.

Amazon no longer supports Internet Explorer 6 or 7, and the site may not behave as expected. Please upgrade to a newer browser.

Interesting Finds Updated Daily. Kindle Cloud Reader Read instantly in your browser. Only 1 left in stock - order soon. Ships from and sold by ejunggust. Turn on 1-Click ordering for this browser. This item does not ship to Russian Federation. Please check other sellers who may ship internationally. To see addresses, please Sign in. Please enter a valid US zip code. Please add the address to your address book. Make sure you include the unit and box numbers if assigned.

Sold by Better World Books. Great condition for a used book! Shipped to over one million happy customers. Unable to add item to List.

Sorry, there was read article problem. There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Have one to sell? Flip to back Flip to front. Casino Jack and the United States of Money: See search results for casino jack and the united states of money review author.

Are you an author? Learn about Author Central. See all 7 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions Price. Boasting a cast of characters and close Abramoff allies like anti-tax activist Grover Norquist and former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed, Casino Jack is a cautionary tale about the seemingly endless ways that lobbyists and campaign casino jack and the united states of money review can buy powerful friends and influence Washington policymaking.

Read more Read less. See all buying options. Superlobbyist Jack Abramoff and the Buying of Washington. Add both to Cart Add both to List. These items are shipped casino jack and the united states of money review and sold by different sellers.

Buy the selected items together This item: Ships from and sold by WND. Customers who bought this item also bought.

Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. Melville House May 4, Language: Share your thoughts with other customers. Write a customer review. There was a problem filtering reviews right now.

Please try again later. By Curious Senior casino jack and the united states of money review March 24, Kindle Edition Verified Purchase. An intriguing look at how the Washington lobbying community works. Stone is a good reporter, but I expect there is more to this story than he was able to uncover. Yes No Report abuse. By Anne Colamosca on August 14, The tale is also well-written and not overly hyped.

Was this review helpful to you? By Bob Eldridge on March 9, My wife is Jail down in Fla and she not guilty. She got 20 years. Jack did everything the accused him of including stealing 40 Millliion from the Native Americans. He got 4 years because he rated on everybody.

My wife like the book very much. By MamaTrixi on March 21, All Republicans should read this book. Know how to impact your government the old Republican Way. Then vote against anyone that has PAC money, regardless of their casino jack and the united states of money review. By LFB on December 6, From the start he was supremely capable, imaginative and quite a force in his own right.

Of course, he went too far in terms of the means justifying the ends. He is also an example of a person getting dirty through association with some of the wrong people. Honesty, I think he could have been a very successful elected official should he have chosen that route. The examples in this documentary show politics at its worst. What I liked about the documentary was that what it chose to show, it did so in a way that was understandable to me.

Surely there must be another side, an untold side, and I would have liked to see that. Nevertheless, I enjoyed and was riveted by this film. By Brandon Wilkening on April 5, This was a highly entertaining and readable account of the Abramoff scandal. Before I started reading it, I had a pretty vague understanding of the whole affair. I had obviously followed the story in the newspapers but tended to get lost in all the details of the intricate plot.

He presents the facts and lets them speak for themselves. He mostly refrains from making moral judgments of Abramoff and his collaborators free roulette the last chapter, in which he situates the scandal within the larger topic of corruption in Washington.

If I had to make a criticism, it might be that the author is sometimes repetitive, as he had a habit of citing certain facts and making certain arguments multiple times. Overall, however, I would recommend this book to anybody looking to gain a better understanding of the Abramoff affair. It makes for a pretty entertaining read at points, mainly just because the just click for source itself is so interesting and populated by such a colorful cast of characters.

As far as I know, this is the only book-length treatment of the Abramoff scandal. By Zato Ici on August 11, A classic tale of corruption in Washington, DC. He introduces the characters, the situation, and describes the "action" in family how much does online casino make LeaLight respectable narrative style.

Sometimes I pay almost no attention to the Federal Government. Check this out book has filled me in admirably. I take off one star for the few places where one wishes the editor had made the author clean up unnecessary repetition, and for the general lack of color.

The style is that of a journalist, not a novelist. A fine job of reducing a complicated story to a brisk, informative read. See all 12 customer reviews newest first. Most recent customer reviews 5. Published on April 18, by Susan Bradford.

With Alex Gibney's doc “Casino Jack and the United States of Money” also around, Parts of this review were contained in my report from Toronto.

Gibney won an Oscar for Documentary Feature in Casino Jack regurgitated the identical story the media had proffered about "evil" Abramoff, and thematically repeated a documentary on Abramoff een online casino beginnen Bill Moyers several years ago. Even though I found his Abramoff documentary tendentious and casino jack and the united states of money review, I admire and respect Gibney and his work very casino jack and the united states of money review. Politically, we are both hard-core liberals.

Because I was writing a book about Abramoff and secretly interviewing him before and during his imprisonment, Gibney and I have been occasionally meeting and talking about the Abramoff scandal for the past three years. My overarching problem was that Gibney made no attempt to be objective, and that he omitted a plethora of important information that might have afforded the audience the opportunity to draw a more balanced, nuanced, and certainly more informed conclusion about this complex scandal.

Gibney apparently knew what his conclusion would be long in free casino bonus. Presumably for that casino jack and the united states of money review, he did not interview anybody who defended Abramoff or anyone who argued that this scandal was far more convoluted than the simplistic, black-and-white narrative that has been repetitiously presented on the public and now by Gibney.

The film opens with footage of the mob murder of Florida businessman Gus Boulis, even though Abramoff had met Boulis only once and had absolutely nothing to do with his murder.

Clearly, these casinos are on par with those in Las Vegas and Atlantic City. And clearly, these thriving casinos, earning hundreds of of dollars a year, belong to Indians who are well-to-do, not bumpkins that just fell off a log.

They can afford the best consultants, lawyers, accountants, and lobbyists. Hence, these particular Indians--for whom Abramoff was the lobbyist--were hardly unsophisticated. Although a handful in the audience might have grasped this, Gibney should have made this point explicitly clear. A large part of what drove the virulent antipathy toward Abramoff was fueled by our collective guilt over the genocide that our European ancestors had committed against the Native Americans.

Inthere were wild celebrations across the country. But inthere were essentially no national or regional celebrations to mark an extraordinary numerical anniversary: Casino jack and the united states of money review were too ashamed.

Yes, the public was infuriated with Abramoff. Here was this white man-- the fact that he was an Orthodox Jew only made matters worse --stealing candy from these casino jack and the united states of money review and unsophisticated Indians. The Washington Postwhich broke this story, exploited this undercurrent of shame brilliantly and cynically. I feel it was disingenuous of Gibney not to make clear in his film that these particular Indians--whom Abramoff was accused of defrauding--were not your stereotypic unemployed Indian, boozing it up on a hard-scrabble reservation.

In the end, these Indians proved to be far more sophisticated than Washington uber-lobbyist Jack Abramoff. John McCain, former chair of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, which also investigated Abramoff, wanted to impart was that not only had Abramoff defrauded his clients, but he had been an ineffective and lousy lobbyist.

In other words, they wanted the public to believe that all these gullible, unsophisticated Indians had not only been bamboozled into paying Abramoff gargantuan sums, but had received little or nothing in return. This, however, is untrue. Abramoff was perhaps the most effective Indian lobbyist who ever lived. It would have been fair if Gibney had at least made that clear just click for source his film.

But he did not. Gibney describes how Abramoff, remember, a lobbyist advocates for and protects his clients the same way a lawyer doesprotected the interests of his client, the Choctaw Indians of Mississippi, so that its casino could keep making money. So Abramoff worked hard to make sure no competing casino ever opened up.

This is the American Way, for better or worse. The Choctaws ran a very lucrative casino near the Alabama border. But first, the Jena Tribe needed to get federal approval. Abramoff did his job. He may have charged a lot, but he did save the Choctaws many hundreds of millions of dollars--far, far in excess of what he charged his client. Gibney should have pointed that out. Gibney also completely omitted another far more spectacular Choctaw success that Abramoff engineered.

He somehow stopped a referendum in next-door Alabama that would have led to the opening of Indian just click for source in that state. Since most of the Choctaw casino clients came from Alabama, the passage of that referendum would have probably put their casino out of business. Once again, Abramoff saved his client hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars, something Gibney did not to mention. Gibney omitted another impressive Abramoff lobbying coup involving the wealthy Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana, which also operated a casino and resort.

The Casino jack and the united states of money review Coushatta had applied to the Bureau of Indian Affairs BIA in for permission to purchase about 9, acres of land "in trust" to augment the size of its reservation. For nearly 75 years, the BIA did nothing but sit on that application. Again, Gibney made no mention of this. It may seem hard to believe, but a complicating factor involved his also shutting down the casino of a tribe miles away in El Paso, Texas.

Gibney focused a lot of attention on casino jack and the united states of money review Tigua tribe of El Paso. The ultimate sleazebag, right? It was Schmidt who was sleazy--some would say dishonest--in how she manipulated the facts.

But her little work of fiction created such a firestorm of public fury against Abramoff that it helped her win a Pulitzer Prize, which, in my opinion, should be rescinded.

The problem is that Schmidt withheld a crucial piece of information from her story. Here are the facts. Please bear with me.

This is a bit complicated. Back inthere was one tribal casino in Texas, and it was being operated illegally something Gibney neglected to mention by the Tigua Tribe in El Paso. There was a second tribe preparing to open its own illegal casino miles away, east of Houston. That second tribe is confusingly called the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas.

A pending bill in the Texas state legislature would have legalized both tribal casinos. Most of its gamblers drove three hours from the Houston area to play slot machines and blackjack in its casino. Why drive three hours to gamble when a new casino has just opened minutes away?

Abramoff needed to stop that Texas bill which would have legalized the two tribal casinos, even though only one of them--the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas--threatened his Louisiana client. Obviously, Abramoff had absolutely no interest in shutting down the Tigua casino, because it was located in El Paso, miles from and therefore no threat to his client in Louisiana. But, yes, if Abramoff could find a way to kill the bill, the Tigua casino would also be shut down.

In another brilliant lobbying coup, which Gibney once again failed to point outAbramoff managed to derail the Texas bill. The bill had already passed in the Texas House by an vote margin. It would have easily passed in the Texas Senate by an even greater margin, but Abramoff was somehow able to prevent the bill from ever reaching the Senate floor for a vote! Hence, the bill failed to become law and both tribal casinos were shut down. She completely omitted the fact that the casino of another tribe--the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas--was the one and only one he was really interested in shuttering.

Her name had appeared on a recent story in which those two facts were identified by her! I discussed this complicated story a number of times with Gibney. In the film, Gibney did not call Schmidt on the carpet for her gross journalistic transgression or question her on this matter at all.

Why he casino jack and the united states of money review her a free pass I find puzzling. This highly selective release of emails allowed McCain to paint Abramoff in the worst possible light, especially since Abramoff foolishly decided not to defend himself during the hearings. On advice of counsel, Abramoff exercised his Fifth Amendment right, which led many to conclude he was guilty. That was only partly true.

The tiny fraction of emails McCain released had been selected and taken out of context in order to generate the greatest possible damage to Abramoff. Gibney knew this, because we discussed it many times, but did not mention it.

This is another key issue that Gibney chose not to address in his film. What exactly was Abramoff guilty of? He never did that, although he did plead guilty to it. Doubtful, although he did plead guilty to this. Even some of the federal prosecutors who worked on the case strongly disagree on this tax-evasion charge. Definitely not, though he did plead guilty to this too.

Defrauding his tribal clients? Perhaps this was not worth mentioning in the film, but Gibney knew this. What crimes did Abramoff actually commit?

Bob Ney to insert frivolous comments in the frivolous Congressional Records Extensions. Abramoff gave lawmakers and their staff free meals, drinks at his restaurant and free seats at sporting events, this web page subsidized a few golf trips. And what did he get in return? He wangled an audience with President George W. Bush for the prime minister of Indonesia.

This is inconsequential compared to the great evils perpetuated by the financial-industry lobbyists, the health-care lobbyists, the tobacco lobbyists, the National Rifle Association, etc. And for these petty gems of sleaze casino jack and the united states of money review, Abramoff is sent to federal prison for four years?

Seems to me like much ado about nothing. What Gibney did not mention in casino jack and the united states of money review film is that lobbying--the right to petition Congress--is protected by the very First Amendment to the Constitution.

Sure, every liberal wants elections to be publicly financed, but it will never happen because of something called the "incumbency advantage. When Abramoff stopped the Republican-controlled Congress from taxing Der bonus primo deposito plus500 MR casinos, do you know how he did it? What those freebies got him was access to the lawmakers and their staff, so he could present a compelling argument.

And what was that compelling argument the depositphotos discount code Tarsaltunnelsyndrom killed the bill?

Casino Jack And The United States Of Money Documentary Economics

Related queries:
- 1st deposit bonus pokerstars
Casino Jack and the United States of Money: Superlobbyist Jack Abramoff and the Buying of Washington [Peter H. Stone] on .
- eurofortune casino
"Casino Jack and the United States of Money" is an insightful, yet occasionally frustrating documentary about the rise and fall of Jack Abramoff, superlobbyist, able.
- zero deposit car leasing uk
Review: United States of corruption - When mega-lobbyist Jack Abramoff was sentenced to jail in early , he was seen as the personification of corruption.
- online casino reviews 2015
"Casino Jack and the United States of Money" is an insightful, yet occasionally frustrating documentary about the rise and fall of Jack Abramoff, superlobbyist, able.
- casino 50 free spins
Review: United States of corruption - When mega-lobbyist Jack Abramoff was sentenced to jail in early , he was seen as the personification of corruption.
- Sitemap